Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Chandra Coffey vs Zena Collins

CC
Chandra Coffey
3 0
3 head-to-head meetings
ZC
Zena Collins
Athlete A
CC
Chandra Coffey
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
ZC
Zena Collins
United States Women's Figure
3 Shared Contests
2003 First Meeting
2005 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Chandra Coffey vs Zena Collins head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Chandra Coffey
3 ahead
Zena Collins
0 ahead
Span
2003–2005

In 3 meetings, Chandra Coffey finished ahead of Zena Collins 3 times to 0.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Chandra Coffey Zena Collins Winner
2005 New York Pro Championships Women's Figure #3 #6 Chandra Coffey
2003 Nationals Women's Figure #1 #2 Chandra Coffey
2003 Junior Nationals Women's Figure #2 #6 Chandra Coffey

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Chandra Coffey
3
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Zena Collins
0
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Chandra Coffey Zena Collins Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →