Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Alexandre Nataf vs Roelly Winklaar

Alexandre Nataf
Alexandre Nataf
0 7
7 head-to-head meetings
Roelly Winklaar
Roelly Winklaar
Athlete A
Alexandre Nataf
Alexandre Nataf
France Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Roelly Winklaar
Roelly Winklaar
Curacao Men's Open Bodybuilding
7 Shared Contests
2009 First Meeting
2014 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Alexandre Nataf vs Roelly Winklaar head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
7
Alexandre Nataf
0 ahead
Roelly Winklaar
7 ahead
Span
2009–2014

In 7 meetings, Roelly Winklaar finished ahead of Alexandre Nataf 7 times to 0.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Alexandre Nataf Roelly Winklaar Winner
2014 Nordic Pro (Finland) Men's Open Bodybuilding #14 #1 Roelly Winklaar
2013 Wings of Strength Chicago Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #17 #1 Roelly Winklaar
2012 Pro Bodybuilding Weekly Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #4 Roelly Winklaar
2012 Tampa Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #4 Roelly Winklaar
2011 New York Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #13 #9 Roelly Winklaar
2011 FIBO Germany Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #3 Roelly Winklaar
2009 Arnold Amateur Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #1 Roelly Winklaar

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Alexandre Nataf
0
Wins Head-to-Head
7 shared contests
Roelly Winklaar
7
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Alexandre Nataf Roelly Winklaar Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →