Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Augustine Walsh vs Lloyd George Stewart

Augustine Walsh
Augustine Walsh
1 6
7 head-to-head meetings
LG
Lloyd George Stewart
Athlete A
Augustine Walsh
Augustine Walsh
United States Other Divisions
Athlete B
LG
Lloyd George Stewart
United States Other Divisions
7 Shared Contests
2005 First Meeting
2014 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Augustine Walsh vs Lloyd George Stewart head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
7
Augustine Walsh
1 ahead
Lloyd George Stewart
6 ahead
Span
2005–2014

In 7 meetings, Lloyd George Stewart finished ahead of Augustine Walsh 6 times to 1.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Augustine Walsh Lloyd George Stewart Winner
2014 World Natural Championships Masters 60+ #1 #2 Augustine Walsh
2013 World Natural Championships Masters 60+ #8 #1 Lloyd George Stewart
2012 World Natural Championships Masters 60+ #3 #1 Lloyd George Stewart
2011 World Natural Championships Masters 60+ #2 #1 Lloyd George Stewart
2007 World Natural Championships Masters 50+ #8 #3 Lloyd George Stewart
2006 World Natural Championships Masters 50+ #5 #3 Lloyd George Stewart
2005 World Natural Championships Masters 50+ #4 #1 Lloyd George Stewart

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Augustine Walsh
1
Wins Head-to-Head
7 shared contests
Lloyd George Stewart
6
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Augustine Walsh Lloyd George Stewart Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →