Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Charles Pearson vs Chad Martin

Charles Pearson
Charles Pearson
2 1
3 head-to-head meetings
Chad Martin
Chad Martin
Athlete A
Charles Pearson
Charles Pearson
United States Men's Classic Physique
Athlete B
Chad Martin
Chad Martin
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
3 Shared Contests
2015 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 15, 2026

Charles Pearson vs Chad Martin head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Charles Pearson
2 ahead
Chad Martin
1 ahead
Span
2015–2016

In 3 meetings, Charles Pearson finished ahead of Chad Martin (2) 2 times to 1.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Charles Pearson Chad Martin Winner
2016 New England Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #5 Charles Pearson
2016 New England Championships Masters 35+ #2 #3 Charles Pearson
2015 New England Championships Masters 35+ #4 #3 Chad Martin

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Charles Pearson
2
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Chad Martin
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Charles Pearson Chad Martin Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →