Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Chelsea Larson vs Carly Starling-Horrell

Chelsea Larson
Chelsea Larson
0 5
5 head-to-head meetings
Carly Starling-Horrell
Carly Starling-Horrell
Athlete A
Chelsea Larson
Chelsea Larson
Canada Women's Figure
Athlete B
Carly Starling-Horrell
Carly Starling-Horrell
United States Women's Figure
5 Shared Contests
2017 First Meeting
2019 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 17, 2026

Chelsea Larson vs Carly Starling-Horrell head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
5
Chelsea Larson
0 ahead
Carly Starling-Horrell
5 ahead
Span
2017–2019
At the Olympia
Chelsea Larson 0–1 Carly Starling-Horrell in 1

In 5 meetings, Carly Starling-Horrell finished ahead of Chelsea Larson 5 times to 0, including 1 Mr. Olympia showdown.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Chelsea Larson Carly Starling-Horrell Winner
2019 IFBB Rising Phoenix Arizona Pro Women's Figure #5 #2 Carly Starling-Horrell
2019 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #16 #5 Carly Starling-Horrell
2018 IFBB Rising Phoenix Arizona Pro Women's Figure #4 #2 Carly Starling-Horrell
2018 IFBB Northern California Pro Women's Figure #5 #1 Carly Starling-Horrell
2017 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Women's Figure #9 #5 Carly Starling-Horrell

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Chelsea Larson
0
Wins Head-to-Head
5 shared contests
Carly Starling-Horrell
5
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Chelsea Larson Carly Starling-Horrell Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.