Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Harcourt Bull vs Michael Hill

HB
Harcourt Bull
1 1
2 head-to-head meetings
MH
Michael Hill
Athlete A
HB
Harcourt Bull
United States Men's Classic Physique
Athlete B
MH
Michael Hill
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
2003 First Meeting
2006 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 17, 2026

Harcourt Bull vs Michael Hill head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Harcourt Bull
1 ahead
Michael Hill
1 ahead
Span
2003–2006

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Harcourt Bull and Michael Hill (1) level at 1 each - too few to call.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Harcourt Bull Michael Hill Winner
2006 South Carolina State Masters #4 #3 Michael Hill
2003 South Carolina State Masters #3 #6 Harcourt Bull

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Harcourt Bull
1
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Michael Hill
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Harcourt Bull Michael Hill Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.