Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Kathryn Connors vs Yamile Marrero

Kathryn Connors
Kathryn Connors
5 3
8 head-to-head meetings
Yamile Marrero
Yamile Marrero
Athlete A
Kathryn Connors
Kathryn Connors
United States Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Yamile Marrero
Yamile Marrero
United States Women's Bodybuilding
8 Shared Contests
2007 First Meeting
2011 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 17, 2026

Kathryn Connors vs Yamile Marrero head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
8
Kathryn Connors
5 ahead
Yamile Marrero
3 ahead
Span
2007–2011

In 8 meetings, Kathryn Connors finished ahead of Yamile Marrero 5 times to 3.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Kathryn Connors Yamile Marrero Winner
2011 IFBB North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #7 #8 Kathryn Connors
2010 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #11 #8 Yamile Marrero
2010 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #11 #7 Yamile Marrero
2009 Masters Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #8 #9 Kathryn Connors
2009 Masters Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #2 #4 Kathryn Connors
2008 USA Championships Women's Bodybuilding #7 #14 Kathryn Connors
2008 Masters Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #2 #11 Kathryn Connors
2007 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #9 #7 Yamile Marrero

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Kathryn Connors
5
Wins Head-to-Head
8 shared contests
Yamile Marrero
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Kathryn Connors Yamile Marrero Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.