Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Leo Ingram vs Craig Richardson

Leo Ingram
Leo Ingram
2 5
7 head-to-head meetings
Craig Richardson
Craig Richardson
Athlete A
Leo Ingram
Leo Ingram
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Craig Richardson
Craig Richardson
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
7 Shared Contests
2007 First Meeting
2009 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Leo Ingram vs Craig Richardson head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
7
Leo Ingram
2 ahead
Craig Richardson
5 ahead
Span
2007–2009
At the Olympia
Leo Ingram 0–1 Craig Richardson in 1

In 7 meetings, Craig Richardson finished ahead of Leo Ingram 5 times to 2, including 1 Mr. Olympia showdown.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Leo Ingram Craig Richardson Winner
2009 Tampa Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #11 Leo Ingram
2009 Atlantic City Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #7 Leo Ingram
2008 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #17 #13 Craig Richardson
2008 New York Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #8 #5 Craig Richardson
2008 Houston Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #2 Craig Richardson
2007 New York Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #14 #7 Craig Richardson
2007 Keystone Pro Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #7 Craig Richardson

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Leo Ingram
2
Wins Head-to-Head
7 shared contests
Craig Richardson
5
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Leo Ingram Craig Richardson Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →