Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Pavlo Zelenko vs Norton James Murayama

Pavlo Zelenko
Pavlo Zelenko
1 3
4 head-to-head meetings
Norton James Murayama
Norton James Murayama
Athlete A
Pavlo Zelenko
Pavlo Zelenko
Russia Other Divisions
Athlete B
Norton James Murayama
Norton James Murayama
Brazil Other Divisions
4 Shared Contests
2009 First Meeting
2011 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 17, 2026

Pavlo Zelenko vs Norton James Murayama head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
4
Pavlo Zelenko
1 ahead
Norton James Murayama
3 ahead
Span
2009–2011

In 4 meetings, Norton James Murayama finished ahead of Pavlo Zelenko 3 times to 1.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Pavlo Zelenko Norton James Murayama Winner
2011 World Championships Masters 40+ #6 #1 Norton James Murayama
2011 Mr Universe Masters 40+ #2 #1 Norton James Murayama
2010 Mr Universe Masters 40+ #2 #3 Pavlo Zelenko
2009 Mr Universe Masters 40+ #3 #1 Norton James Murayama

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Pavlo Zelenko
1
Wins Head-to-Head
4 shared contests
Norton James Murayama
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Pavlo Zelenko Norton James Murayama Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.