Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Rae Anne Bettencourt vs Laveca Smith

Rae Anne Bettencourt
Rae Anne Bettencourt
2 0
2 head-to-head meetings
Laveca Smith
Laveca Smith
Athlete A
Rae Anne Bettencourt
Rae Anne Bettencourt
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Laveca Smith
Laveca Smith
United States Women's Figure
2 Shared Contests
2015 First Meeting
2019 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 18, 2026

Rae Anne Bettencourt vs Laveca Smith head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Rae Anne Bettencourt
2 ahead
Laveca Smith
0 ahead
Span
2015–2019

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Rae Anne Bettencourt ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Rae Anne Bettencourt Laveca Smith Winner
2019 Masters Nationals Women's Physique #2 #3 Rae Anne Bettencourt
2015 Junior USA Women's Physique #11 #14 Rae Anne Bettencourt

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Rae Anne Bettencourt
2
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Laveca Smith
0
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Rae Anne Bettencourt Laveca Smith Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.