Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Reed Masters vs Mickey Glenn

RM
Reed Masters
3 0
3 head-to-head meetings
Mickey Glenn
Mickey Glenn
Athlete A
RM
Reed Masters
United States Other Divisions
Athlete B
Mickey Glenn
Mickey Glenn
United States Other Divisions
3 Shared Contests
2005 First Meeting
2007 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 15, 2026

Reed Masters vs Mickey Glenn head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Reed Masters
3 ahead
Mickey Glenn
0 ahead
Span
2005–2007

In 3 meetings, Reed Masters finished ahead of Mickey Glenn 3 times to 0.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Reed Masters Mickey Glenn Winner
2007 Masters Nationals Masters 60+ LightWeight #1 #12 Reed Masters
2007 Masters Nationals Masters 50+ LightWeight #4 #7 Reed Masters
2005 Masters Nationals Masters 50+ MiddleWeight #8 #11 Reed Masters

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Reed Masters
3
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Mickey Glenn
0
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Reed Masters Mickey Glenn Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →