Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Ro Schroer vs Jim Holcomb

Ro Schroer
Ro Schroer
1 1
2 head-to-head meetings
Jim Holcomb
Jim Holcomb
Athlete A
Ro Schroer
Ro Schroer
United States Men's Classic Physique
Athlete B
Jim Holcomb
Jim Holcomb
United States Men's Classic Physique
2 Shared Contests
2017 First Meeting
2020 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Ro Schroer vs Jim Holcomb head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Ro Schroer
1 ahead
Jim Holcomb
1 ahead
Span
2017–2020

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Ro Schroer and Jim Holcomb level at 1 each - too few to call.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Ro Schroer Jim Holcomb Winner
2020 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Masters Championships Men's Classic Physique #8 #4 Jim Holcomb
2017 IFBB Tampa Pro Masters #2 #9 Ro Schroer

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Ro Schroer
1
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Jim Holcomb
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Ro Schroer Jim Holcomb Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →