Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Roxanne Edwards vs Janeen Lankowski

Roxanne Edwards
Roxanne Edwards
3 4
7 head-to-head meetings
Janeen Lankowski
Janeen Lankowski
Athlete A
Roxanne Edwards
Roxanne Edwards
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Janeen Lankowski
Janeen Lankowski
Canada Women's Bodybuilding
7 Shared Contests
2010 First Meeting
2015 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Roxanne Edwards vs Janeen Lankowski head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
7
Roxanne Edwards
3 ahead
Janeen Lankowski
4 ahead
Span
2010–2015

In 7 meetings, Janeen Lankowski finished ahead of Roxanne Edwards 4 times to 3.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Roxanne Edwards Janeen Lankowski Winner
2015 IFBB Tampa Pro Women's Physique #6 #10 Roxanne Edwards
2015 Tampa Pro Championships Women's Physique #6 #10 Roxanne Edwards
2014 Chicago Pro Championships Women's Bodybuilding #10 #13 Roxanne Edwards
2012 Pro Bodybuilding Weekly Championships Women's Bodybuilding #15 #3 Janeen Lankowski
2012 Tampa Pro Championships Women's Bodybuilding #15 #3 Janeen Lankowski
2010 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #10 #2 Janeen Lankowski
2010 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #10 #2 Janeen Lankowski

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Roxanne Edwards
3
Wins Head-to-Head
7 shared contests
Janeen Lankowski
4
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Roxanne Edwards Janeen Lankowski Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →