Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Troy Alves vs Ahmad Haidar

Troy Alves
Troy Alves
5 3
8 head-to-head meetings
Ahmad Haidar
Ahmad Haidar
Athlete A
Troy Alves
Troy Alves
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Ahmad Haidar
Ahmad Haidar
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
8 Shared Contests
2003 First Meeting
2009 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 19, 2026

Troy Alves vs Ahmad Haidar head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
8
Troy Alves
5 ahead
Ahmad Haidar
3 ahead
Span
2003–2009
At the Olympia
Troy Alves 0–1 Ahmad Haidar in 1

In 8 meetings, Troy Alves finished ahead of Ahmad Haidar 5 times to 3, including 1 Mr. Olympia showdown.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Troy Alves Ahmad Haidar Winner
2009 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #5 Ahmad Haidar
2006 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #9 Troy Alves
2006 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #10 #12 Troy Alves
2004 Show of Strength Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #9 Troy Alves
2004 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #15 #13 Ahmad Haidar
2003 San Francisco Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #6 Troy Alves
2003 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #4 #7 Troy Alves
2003 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #10 #7 Ahmad Haidar

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Troy Alves
5
Wins Head-to-Head
8 shared contests
Ahmad Haidar
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Troy Alves Ahmad Haidar Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.