Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Akio Kawakami vs Ibrahim Bin Sihat

Akio Kawakami
Akio Kawakami
2 1
3 head-to-head meetings
Ibrahim Bin Sihat
Ibrahim Bin Sihat
Athlete A
Akio Kawakami
Akio Kawakami
Japan Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Ibrahim Bin Sihat
Ibrahim Bin Sihat
Singapore Men's Open Bodybuilding
3 Shared Contests
1981 First Meeting
1987 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Akio Kawakami vs Ibrahim Bin Sihat head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Akio Kawakami
2 ahead
Ibrahim Bin Sihat
1 ahead
Span
1981–1987

In 3 meetings, Akio Kawakami finished ahead of Ibrahim Bin Sihat 2 times to 1.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Akio Kawakami Ibrahim Bin Sihat Winner
1987 Asian Amateur Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #1 Ibrahim Bin Sihat
1985 Asian Amateur Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Akio Kawakami
1981 Asian Amateur Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #3 Akio Kawakami

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Akio Kawakami
2
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Ibrahim Bin Sihat
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Akio Kawakami Ibrahim Bin Sihat Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →