Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell vs Mary Elizabeth Lado

Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell
Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell
1 4
5 head-to-head meetings
Mary Elizabeth Lado
Mary Elizabeth Lado
Athlete A
Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell
Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Mary Elizabeth Lado
Mary Elizabeth Lado
United States Women's Figure
5 Shared Contests
2005 First Meeting
2007 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 17, 2026

Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell vs Mary Elizabeth Lado head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
5
Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell
1 ahead
Mary Elizabeth Lado
4 ahead
Span
2005–2007
At the Olympia
Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell 1–1 Mary Elizabeth Lado in 2

In 5 meetings, Mary Elizabeth Lado finished ahead of Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell 4 times to 1, including 2 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell Mary Elizabeth Lado Winner
2007 Ms International Women's Figure #2 #1 Mary Elizabeth Lado
2007 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #5 #10 Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell
2006 Ms International Women's Figure #3 #1 Mary Elizabeth Lado
2005 Sacramento Pro Women's Figure #7 #4 Mary Elizabeth Lado
2005 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #8 #5 Mary Elizabeth Lado

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell
1
Wins Head-to-Head
5 shared contests
Mary Elizabeth Lado
4
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Amanda Jo Earhart-Savell Mary Elizabeth Lado Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.