Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Anja Schreiner vs Jackie Paisley

Anja Schreiner
Anja Schreiner
2 2
4 head-to-head meetings
Jackie Paisley
Jackie Paisley
Athlete A
Anja Schreiner
Anja Schreiner
United States Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Jackie Paisley
Jackie Paisley
United States Women's Bodybuilding
4 Shared Contests
1989 First Meeting
1991 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Anja Schreiner vs Jackie Paisley head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
4
Anja Schreiner
2 ahead
Jackie Paisley
2 ahead
Span
1989–1991
At the Olympia
Anja Schreiner 2–0 Jackie Paisley in 2

In 4 meetings, including 2 at the Ms. Olympia, Anja Schreiner and Jackie Paisley are dead even, finishing ahead 2 times apiece.

Every contest Anja Schreiner and Jackie Paisley both entered

Year Contest Division Anja Schreiner Jackie Paisley Winner
1991 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #8 #11 Anja Schreiner
1990 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #3 #2 Jackie Paisley
1990 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #3 #5 Anja Schreiner
1989 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #11 #1 Jackie Paisley

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Anja Schreiner and Jackie Paisley meet that test 4 times. For scale, this database holds 9 recorded results for Anja Schreiner and 12 for Jackie Paisley across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Anja Schreiner and Jackie Paisley at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Anja Schreiner reached her competitive peak from 1991 to 1992, her strongest placement years on record (40% win rate across 5 contests in the window).

Jackie Paisley reached her competitive peak from 1986 to 1988, her strongest placement years on record (25% win rate across 4 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Jackie Paisley, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

The 1989 Ms. International is the biggest title, and she was runner-up there the following year and third the year before. Three consecutive podiums at the Arnold's own women's contest.

She was also runner-up at the 1989 World Pro Championships and fourth at the Olympia in 1989 and fifth in 1990.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.