Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Beverly Hahn vs Colleen Yates

Beverly Hahn
Beverly Hahn
1 1
2 head-to-head meetings
Colleen Yates
Colleen Yates
Athlete A
Beverly Hahn
Beverly Hahn
United Kingdom Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Colleen Yates
Colleen Yates
United Kingdom Women's Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
1989 First Meeting
1993 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Beverly Hahn vs Colleen Yates head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Beverly Hahn
1 ahead
Colleen Yates
1 ahead
Span
1989–1993

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Beverly Hahn and Colleen Yates level at 1 each - too few to call.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Beverly Hahn Colleen Yates Winner
1993 British Championships Women's Bodybuilding #1 #2 Beverly Hahn
1989 Ms Britain Women's Bodybuilding #3 #2 Colleen Yates

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Beverly Hahn
1
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Colleen Yates
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Beverly Hahn Colleen Yates Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →