Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Candice John vs Natalie Waples

Candice John
Candice John
6 3
10 head-to-head meetings
Natalie Waples
Natalie Waples
Athlete A
Candice John
Candice John
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Natalie Waples
Natalie Waples
Canada Women's Bikini
10 Shared Contests
1 Ties
2011 First Meeting
2013 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Candice John vs Natalie Waples head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
10
Candice John
6 ahead
Natalie Waples
3 ahead
Ties
1
Span
2011–2013
At the Olympia
Candice John 1–0 Natalie Waples in 2

In 10 meetings, Candice John finished ahead of Natalie Waples 6 times to 3, including 2 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Candice John Natalie Waples Winner
2013 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #15 #16 Candice John
2013 Toronto Pro Supershow Women's Figure #5 #3 Natalie Waples
2013 Europa Super Show Women's Figure #6 #9 Candice John
2013 Toronto Pro Women's Figure #5 #3 Natalie Waples
2012 IFBB Fort Lauderdale Pro Women's Figure #6 #5 Natalie Waples
2012 Europa Show of Champions Women's Figure #2 #7 Candice John
2012 Orlando Show of Champions Women's Figure #2 #7 Candice John
2012 European Pro Women's Figure #2 #7 Candice John
2011 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #16 #16 Tie
2011 Toronto Pro Women's Figure #2 #13 Candice John

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Candice John
6
Wins Head-to-Head
10 shared contests
Natalie Waples
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Candice John Natalie Waples Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →