Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Cheryl Cole vs Emily Holder

CC
Cheryl Cole
0 2
2 head-to-head meetings
Emily Holder
Emily Holder
Athlete A
CC
Cheryl Cole
United States Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Emily Holder
Emily Holder
United States Women's Physique
2 Shared Contests
2005 First Meeting
2006 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Cheryl Cole vs Emily Holder head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Cheryl Cole
0 ahead
Emily Holder
2 ahead
Span
2005–2006

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Emily Holder ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Cheryl Cole Emily Holder Winner
2006 Masters Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #9 #2 Emily Holder
2005 Masters Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #6 #1 Emily Holder

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Cheryl Cole
0
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Emily Holder
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Cheryl Cole Emily Holder Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →