Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Colleen Yates vs Donna Hartley-Wass

Colleen Yates
Colleen Yates
1 3
4 head-to-head meetings
DH
Donna Hartley-Wass
Athlete A
Colleen Yates
Colleen Yates
United Kingdom Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
DH
Donna Hartley-Wass
United Kingdom Women's Bodybuilding
4 Shared Contests
1987 First Meeting
1988 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Colleen Yates vs Donna Hartley-Wass head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
4
Colleen Yates
1 ahead
Donna Hartley-Wass
3 ahead
Span
1987–1988

In 4 meetings, Donna Hartley-Wass finished ahead of Colleen Yates 3 times to 1.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Colleen Yates Donna Hartley-Wass Winner
1988 Ms Britain Women's Bodybuilding #2 #1 Donna Hartley-Wass
1988 Universe Women's Bodybuilding #4 #2 Donna Hartley-Wass
1987 Ms Britain Women's Bodybuilding #2 #3 Colleen Yates
1987 Universe Women's Bodybuilding #7 #3 Donna Hartley-Wass

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Colleen Yates
1
Wins Head-to-Head
4 shared contests
Donna Hartley-Wass
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Colleen Yates Donna Hartley-Wass Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →