Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Craig Titus vs Shari Kamali

Craig Titus
Craig Titus
4 5
9 head-to-head meetings
Shari Kamali
Shari Kamali
Athlete A
Craig Titus
Craig Titus
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Shari Kamali
Shari Kamali
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
9 Shared Contests
2001 First Meeting
2005 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Craig Titus vs Shari Kamali head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Craig Titus
4 ahead
Shari Kamali
5 ahead
Span
2001–2005
At the Olympia
Craig Titus 1–1 Shari Kamali in 2

In 9 meetings, Shari Kamali finished ahead of Craig Titus 5 times to 4, including 2 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Craig Titus Shari Kamali Winner
2005 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #5 Shari Kamali
2004 Grand Prix Australia Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #5 Shari Kamali
2004 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #8 Craig Titus
2003 Night of Champions Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #4 Craig Titus
2002 Show of Strength Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #11 Craig Titus
2002 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #17 Craig Titus
2001 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #10 Shari Kamali
2001 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #3 Shari Kamali
2001 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #4 Shari Kamali

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Craig Titus
4
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Shari Kamali
5
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Craig Titus Shari Kamali Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →