Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Craig Whitehead vs Jim Haislop

CW
Craig Whitehead
0 3
3 head-to-head meetings
Jim Haislop
Jim Haislop
Athlete A
CW
Craig Whitehead
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Jim Haislop
Jim Haislop
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
3 Shared Contests
1967 First Meeting
1968 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Craig Whitehead vs Jim Haislop head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Craig Whitehead
0 ahead
Jim Haislop
3 ahead
Span
1967–1968

In 3 meetings, Jim Haislop finished ahead of Craig Whitehead 3 times to 0.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Craig Whitehead Jim Haislop Winner
1968 Mr America Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #1 Jim Haislop
1967 Mr USA Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #1 Jim Haislop
1967 Mr America Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #2 Jim Haislop

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Craig Whitehead
0
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Jim Haislop
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Craig Whitehead Jim Haislop Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →