Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Dan Decker vs Khanjo Hakeem

Dan Decker
Dan Decker
2 0
2 head-to-head meetings
Khanjo Hakeem
Khanjo Hakeem
Athlete A
Dan Decker
Dan Decker
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Khanjo Hakeem
Khanjo Hakeem
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
2007 First Meeting
2012 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Dan Decker vs Khanjo Hakeem head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Dan Decker
2 ahead
Khanjo Hakeem
0 ahead
Span
2007–2012

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Dan Decker ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Dan Decker Khanjo Hakeem Winner
2012 USA Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #4 #11 Dan Decker
2007 Los Angeles Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #9 Dan Decker

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Dan Decker
2
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Khanjo Hakeem
0
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Dan Decker Khanjo Hakeem Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →