Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Diana Cook vs Michelle Ivers-Brent

Diana Cook
Diana Cook
0 3
3 head-to-head meetings
Michelle Ivers-Brent
Michelle Ivers-Brent
Athlete A
Diana Cook
Diana Cook
United States Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Michelle Ivers-Brent
Michelle Ivers-Brent
United States Women's Bodybuilding
3 Shared Contests
2008 First Meeting
2009 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Diana Cook vs Michelle Ivers-Brent head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Diana Cook
0 ahead
Michelle Ivers-Brent
3 ahead
Span
2008–2009

In 3 meetings, Michelle Ivers-Brent finished ahead of Diana Cook 3 times to 0.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Diana Cook Michelle Ivers-Brent Winner
2009 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #8 #7 Michelle Ivers-Brent
2008 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #6 #2 Michelle Ivers-Brent
2008 Masters Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #8 #3 Michelle Ivers-Brent

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Diana Cook
0
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Michelle Ivers-Brent
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Diana Cook Michelle Ivers-Brent Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →