Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Felicia Romero vs Larissa Reis

Felicia Romero
Felicia Romero
4 4
8 head-to-head meetings
Larissa Reis
Larissa Reis
Athlete A
Felicia Romero
Felicia Romero
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Larissa Reis
Larissa Reis
Australia Women's Figure
8 Shared Contests
2009 First Meeting
2012 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Felicia Romero vs Larissa Reis head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
8
Felicia Romero
4 ahead
Larissa Reis
4 ahead
Span
2009–2012
At the Olympia
Felicia Romero 2–1 Larissa Reis in 3

In 8 meetings, including 3 Mr. Olympia showdowns, Felicia Romero and Larissa Reis are dead even, finishing ahead 4 times apiece.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Felicia Romero Larissa Reis Winner
2012 IFBB Tournament of Champions Women's Figure #6 #5 Larissa Reis
2012 IFBB Europa SuperShow Women's Figure #7 #2 Larissa Reis
2011 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #15 #10 Larissa Reis
2011 Sheru Classic India Women's Figure #10 #6 Larissa Reis
2011 Ms International Women's Figure #4 #11 Felicia Romero
2010 Ms International Women's Figure #5 #6 Felicia Romero
2010 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #5 #10 Felicia Romero
2009 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #9 #12 Felicia Romero

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Felicia Romero
4
Wins Head-to-Head
8 shared contests
Larissa Reis
4
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Felicia Romero Larissa Reis Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →