Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Günter Schlierkamp vs Orville Burke

Günter Schlierkamp
Günter Schlierkamp
2 5
7 head-to-head meetings
Orville Burke
Orville Burke
Athlete A
Günter Schlierkamp
Günter Schlierkamp
Germany Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Orville Burke
Orville Burke
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
7 Shared Contests
2000 First Meeting
2002 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 19, 2026

Günter Schlierkamp vs Orville Burke head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
7
Günter Schlierkamp
2 ahead
Orville Burke
5 ahead
Span
2000–2002
At the Olympia
Günter Schlierkamp 1–2 Orville Burke in 3

In 7 meetings, Orville Burke finished ahead of Günter Schlierkamp 5 times to 2, including 3 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Günter Schlierkamp Orville Burke Winner
2002 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #9 Günter Schlierkamp
2001 Toronto Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #1 Orville Burke
2001 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #15 #6 Orville Burke
2001 Night of Champions Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #1 Orville Burke
2000 World Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #3 Orville Burke
2000 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #10 Orville Burke
2000 Grand Prix England Men's Open Bodybuilding #4 #6 Günter Schlierkamp

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Günter Schlierkamp
2
Wins Head-to-Head
7 shared contests
Orville Burke
5
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Günter Schlierkamp Orville Burke Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.