Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Gayle Moher vs Jitka Harazimova

Gayle Moher
Gayle Moher
3 3
6 head-to-head meetings
Jitka Harazimova
Jitka Harazimova
Athlete A
Gayle Moher
Gayle Moher
United Kingdom Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Jitka Harazimova
Jitka Harazimova
United States Women's Bodybuilding
6 Shared Contests
1997 First Meeting
2006 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 17, 2026

Gayle Moher vs Jitka Harazimova head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
6
Gayle Moher
3 ahead
Jitka Harazimova
3 ahead
Span
1997–2006
At the Olympia
Gayle Moher 1–2 Jitka Harazimova in 3

In 6 meetings, including 3 Mr. Olympia showdowns, Gayle Moher and Jitka Harazimova are dead even, finishing ahead 3 times apiece.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Gayle Moher Jitka Harazimova Winner
2006 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #9 #10 Gayle Moher
1999 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #6 #10 Gayle Moher
1998 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #3 #8 Gayle Moher
1998 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #11 #7 Jitka Harazimova
1997 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #5 #4 Jitka Harazimova
1997 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #12 #6 Jitka Harazimova

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Gayle Moher
3
Wins Head-to-Head
6 shared contests
Jitka Harazimova
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Gayle Moher Jitka Harazimova Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.