Greg Grant vs Peter Jablonski
Greg Grant 
Pick two different athletes to compare.
Greg Grant vs Peter Jablonski head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.
- Meetings
- 3
- Greg Grant
- 0 ahead
- Peter Jablonski
- 3 ahead
- Span
- 2005–2006
In 3 meetings, Peter Jablonski finished ahead of Greg Grant 3 times to 0.
Head-to-Head Meetings
| Year | Contest | Division | Greg Grant | Peter Jablonski | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Pacific USA Championships | Masters 40+ | #2 | #1 | Peter Jablonski |
| 2006 | Los Angeles Championships | Masters 40+ | #8 | #5 | Peter Jablonski |
| 2005 | Pacific USA Championships | Masters 40+ | #2 | #1 | Peter Jablonski |
Greg Grant profile Peter Jablonski profile Compare other athletes
Head-to-Head at Shared Contests
They never met in competition
Attribute Tug-of-War
Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.
Not enough data to compare
Career attributes could not be calculated for one or both athletes.
Career Overlap Timeline
Career timeline unavailable
We do not have enough dated contest results to draw a timeline.
Career Stats Comparison
Shared Contest History
| Year | Contest | Division | Greg Grant | Peter Jablonski | Winner |
|---|
No shared contests found
These two athletes do not appear to have competed at the same contests in our database.
Browse all contestsShare This Comparison
Comparison unavailable
We could not load this comparison. This might be a temporary connection issue.
Choose two athletes to compare
Search above to compare career stats, head-to-head meetings, and shared contests.
This page counts finishing positions
Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.
- A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
- Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
- Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
- A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.