Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

James Prior vs Ken Stevens

JP
James Prior
1 1
2 head-to-head meetings
Ken Stevens
Ken Stevens
Athlete A
JP
James Prior
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Ken Stevens
Ken Stevens
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
2005 First Meeting
2006 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

James Prior vs Ken Stevens head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
James Prior
1 ahead
Ken Stevens
1 ahead
Span
2005–2006

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with James Prior and Ken Stevens level at 1 each - too few to call.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division James Prior Ken Stevens Winner
2006 New England Championships Masters 40+ #11 #10 Ken Stevens
2005 New England Championships Masters #5 #9 James Prior

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

James Prior
1
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Ken Stevens
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division James Prior Ken Stevens Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →