Janeen Lankowski vs Michelle Ivers-Brent
Janeen Lankowski 
Michelle Ivers-Brent 
Pick two different athletes to compare.
Janeen Lankowski vs Michelle Ivers-Brent head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.
- Meetings
- 5
- Janeen Lankowski
- 1 ahead
- Michelle Ivers-Brent
- 4 ahead
- Span
- 2009–2013
In 5 meetings, Michelle Ivers-Brent finished ahead of Janeen Lankowski 4 times to 1.
Head-to-Head Meetings
| Year | Contest | Division | Janeen Lankowski | Michelle Ivers-Brent | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Toronto Pro Supershow | Women's Bodybuilding | #13 | #12 | Michelle Ivers-Brent |
| 2012 | Pro Bodybuilding Weekly Championships | Women's Bodybuilding | #3 | #16 | Janeen Lankowski |
| 2010 | North American Championships | Women's Bodybuilding | #2 | #1 | Michelle Ivers-Brent |
| 2010 | North American Championships | Women's Bodybuilding | #2 | #1 | Michelle Ivers-Brent |
| 2009 | North American Championships | Women's Bodybuilding | #9 | #7 | Michelle Ivers-Brent |
Janeen Lankowski profile Michelle Ivers-Brent profile Compare other athletes
Head-to-Head at Shared Contests
They never met in competition
Attribute Tug-of-War
Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.
Not enough data to compare
Career attributes could not be calculated for one or both athletes.
Career Overlap Timeline
Career timeline unavailable
We do not have enough dated contest results to draw a timeline.
Career Stats Comparison
Shared Contest History
| Year | Contest | Division | Janeen Lankowski | Michelle Ivers-Brent | Winner |
|---|
No shared contests found
These two athletes do not appear to have competed at the same contests in our database.
Browse all contestsShare This Comparison
Comparison unavailable
We could not load this comparison. This might be a temporary connection issue.
Choose two athletes to compare
Search above to compare career stats, head-to-head meetings, and shared contests.
This page counts finishing positions
Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.
- A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
- Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
- Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
- A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.