Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Janeen Lankowski vs Wendy McMaster

Janeen Lankowski
Janeen Lankowski
4 2
6 head-to-head meetings
Wendy McMaster
Wendy McMaster
Athlete A
Janeen Lankowski
Janeen Lankowski
Canada Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Wendy McMaster
Wendy McMaster
Canada Women's Bodybuilding
6 Shared Contests
2007 First Meeting
2011 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 16, 2026

Janeen Lankowski vs Wendy McMaster head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
6
Janeen Lankowski
4 ahead
Wendy McMaster
2 ahead
Span
2007–2011

In 6 meetings, Janeen Lankowski finished ahead of Wendy McMaster 4 times to 2.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Janeen Lankowski Wendy McMaster Winner
2011 IFBB North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #1 #3 Janeen Lankowski
2009 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #9 #6 Wendy McMaster
2009 Canadian Championships Women's Bodybuilding #6 #8 Janeen Lankowski
2008 North American Championships Women's Bodybuilding #5 #11 Janeen Lankowski
2008 Canadian Championships Women's Bodybuilding #7 #4 Wendy McMaster
2007 Canadian Championships Women's Bodybuilding #2 #4 Janeen Lankowski

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Janeen Lankowski
4
Wins Head-to-Head
6 shared contests
Wendy McMaster
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Janeen Lankowski Wendy McMaster Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →