Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

John Elsberry vs Pete Pitrone

JE
John Elsberry
0 2
2 head-to-head meetings
PP
Pete Pitrone
Athlete A
JE
John Elsberry
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
PP
Pete Pitrone
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
1998 First Meeting
2000 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

John Elsberry vs Pete Pitrone head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
John Elsberry
0 ahead
Pete Pitrone
2 ahead
Span
1998–2000

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Pete Pitrone ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division John Elsberry Pete Pitrone Winner
2000 Can-Am Natural Masters 40+ #2 #1 Pete Pitrone
1998 Olympus Natural Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #1 Pete Pitrone

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

John Elsberry
0
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Pete Pitrone
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division John Elsberry Pete Pitrone Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →