Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

John Lee vs Mohamed Nasr

JL
John Lee
1 1
2 head-to-head meetings
MN
Mohamed Nasr
Athlete A
JL
John Lee
United Kingdom Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
MN
Mohamed Nasr
Egypt Other Divisions
2 Shared Contests
1950 First Meeting
1952 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

John Lee vs Mohamed Nasr head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
John Lee
1 ahead
Mohamed Nasr
1 ahead
Span
1950–1952

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with John Lee and Mohamed Nasr level at 1 each - too few to call.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division John Lee Mohamed Nasr Winner
1952 Mr Universe Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #1 Mohamed Nasr
1950 Mr Universe Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #3 John Lee

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

John Lee
1
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Mohamed Nasr
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division John Lee Mohamed Nasr Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →