Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Ken Jones vs Miloš Šarčev

Ken Jones
Ken Jones
0 5
5 head-to-head meetings
Miloš Šarčev
Miloš Šarčev
Athlete A
Ken Jones
Ken Jones
United States Men's Physique
Athlete B
Miloš Šarčev
Miloš Šarčev
Netherlands Men's Open Bodybuilding
5 Shared Contests
1998 First Meeting
1999 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Ken Jones vs Miloš Šarčev head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
5
Ken Jones
0 ahead
Miloš Šarčev
5 ahead
Span
1998–1999

In 5 meetings, Miloš Šarčev finished ahead of Ken Jones 5 times to 0.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Ken Jones Miloš Šarčev Winner
1999 World Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #16 #5 Miloš Šarčev
1999 Toronto Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #18 #2 Miloš Šarčev
1999 Grand Prix England Men's Open Bodybuilding #18 #5 Miloš Šarčev
1998 Grand Prix Germany Men's Open Bodybuilding #13 #5 Miloš Šarčev
1998 Grand Prix Finland Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #5 Miloš Šarčev

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Ken Jones
0
Wins Head-to-Head
5 shared contests
Miloš Šarčev
5
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Ken Jones Miloš Šarčev Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →