Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Lisa Kelly vs Natasha McFarlane

Lisa Kelly
Lisa Kelly
0 2
2 head-to-head meetings
NM
Natasha McFarlane
Athlete A
Lisa Kelly
Lisa Kelly
United Kingdom Women's Bikini
Athlete B
NM
Natasha McFarlane
United Kingdom Women's Figure
2 Shared Contests
2015 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 18, 2026

Lisa Kelly vs Natasha McFarlane head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Lisa Kelly
0 ahead
Natasha McFarlane
2 ahead
Span
2015–2016

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Natasha McFarlane ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Lisa Kelly Natasha McFarlane Winner
2016 British Championships Women's Figure #5 #1 Natasha McFarlane
2015 British Championships Women's Figure #3 #2 Natasha McFarlane

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Lisa Kelly
0
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Natasha McFarlane
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Lisa Kelly Natasha McFarlane Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.