Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Martyn Yates-Brown vs Roberto Calcagno

MY
Martyn Yates-Brown
0 1
2 head-to-head meetings
RC
Roberto Calcagno
Athlete A
MY
Martyn Yates-Brown
United Kingdom Other Divisions
Athlete B
RC
Roberto Calcagno
United States Other Divisions
2 Shared Contests
1 Ties
2005 First Meeting
2010 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 15, 2026

Martyn Yates-Brown vs Roberto Calcagno head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Martyn Yates-Brown
0 ahead
Roberto Calcagno
1 ahead
Ties
1
Span
2005–2010

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Roberto Calcagno ahead 1 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Martyn Yates-Brown Roberto Calcagno Winner
2010 Universe Masters 55+ #5 #2 Roberto Calcagno
2005 World Championships Masters 50+ #2 #2 Tie

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Martyn Yates-Brown
0
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Roberto Calcagno
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Martyn Yates-Brown Roberto Calcagno Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →