Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Ron Love vs Van Walcott Smith

Ron Love
Ron Love
3 6
9 head-to-head meetings
VW
Van Walcott Smith
Athlete A
Ron Love
Ron Love
Netherlands Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
VW
Van Walcott Smith
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
9 Shared Contests
1990 First Meeting
1993 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 15, 2026

Ron Love vs Van Walcott Smith head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Ron Love
3 ahead
Van Walcott Smith
6 ahead
Span
1990–1993

In 9 meetings, Van Walcott Smith finished ahead of Ron Love 6 times to 3.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Ron Love Van Walcott Smith Winner
1993 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #16 Ron Love
1991 San Jose Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #11 Ron Love
1991 Pittsburgh Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #14 Ron Love
1990 Grand Prix Italy Men's Open Bodybuilding #13 #10 Van Walcott Smith
1990 Grand Prix Holland Men's Open Bodybuilding #15 #10 Van Walcott Smith
1990 Grand Prix Germany Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #9 Van Walcott Smith
1990 Grand Prix France Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #6 Van Walcott Smith
1990 Grand Prix Finland Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #7 Van Walcott Smith
1990 Grand Prix England Men's Open Bodybuilding #10 #7 Van Walcott Smith

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Ron Love
3
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Van Walcott Smith
6
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Ron Love Van Walcott Smith Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →