Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Kevin English vs Jose Raymond

Kevin English
Kevin English
8 1
9 head-to-head meetings
Jose Raymond
Jose Raymond
Athlete A
Kevin English
Kevin English
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Jose Raymond
Jose Raymond
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
9 Shared Contests
2009 First Meeting
2015 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 18, 2026

Kevin English vs Jose Raymond head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Kevin English
8 ahead
Jose Raymond
1 ahead
Span
2009–2015
At the Olympia
Kevin English 4–1 Jose Raymond in 5

In 9 meetings, Kevin English finished ahead of Jose Raymond 8 times to 1, including 5 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Kevin English Jose Raymond Winner
2015 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #16 #2 Jose Raymond
2013 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #3 #4 Kevin English
2012 New York Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #3 Kevin English
2012 New York Pro Men's 212 Bodybuilding #1 #3 Kevin English
2011 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #1 #3 Kevin English
2010 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #1 #4 Kevin English
2010 New York Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Kevin English
2009 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #1 #6 Kevin English
2009 New York Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #8 Kevin English

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Kevin English
8
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Jose Raymond
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Kevin English Jose Raymond Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.