Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Andre Ferguson vs Jeremy Potvin

Andre Ferguson
Andre Ferguson
4 3
7 head-to-head meetings
Jeremy Potvin
Jeremy Potvin
Athlete A
Andre Ferguson
Andre Ferguson
United States Men's Physique
Athlete B
Jeremy Potvin
Jeremy Potvin
United States Men's Physique
7 Shared Contests
2016 First Meeting
2023 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 22, 2026

Andre Ferguson vs Jeremy Potvin head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
7
Andre Ferguson
4 ahead
Jeremy Potvin
3 ahead
Span
2016–2023
At the Olympia
Andre Ferguson 2–3 Jeremy Potvin in 5

In 7 meetings, Andre Ferguson finished ahead of Jeremy Potvin 4 times to 3, including 5 at the Men's Physique Olympia.

Every contest Andre Ferguson and Jeremy Potvin both entered

Year Contest Division Andre Ferguson Jeremy Potvin Winner
2023 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #14 #10 Jeremy Potvin
2020 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #6 #4 Jeremy Potvin
2018 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #5 #10 Andre Ferguson
2017 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #2 #5 Andre Ferguson
2017 Arnold Classic Men's Classic Physique #2 #5 Andre Ferguson
2016 IFBB New York Pro Men's Physique #2 #9 Andre Ferguson
2016 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #5 #3 Jeremy Potvin

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Andre Ferguson and Jeremy Potvin meet that test 7 times. For scale, this database holds 57 recorded results for Andre Ferguson and 16 for Jeremy Potvin across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 22, 2026.

Andre Ferguson and Jeremy Potvin at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Andre Ferguson reached his competitive peak from 2015 to 2016, one of his strongest stretches (30% win rate across 10 contests in the window).

Jeremy Potvin reached his competitive peak from 2015 to 2017, his strongest placement years on record (14% win rate across 7 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Andre Ferguson, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Twenty professional wins is among the highest totals in the division. They run from the Europa Atlantic City Pro in 2015 to two shows in 2026, with four in 2017 alone: the Miami Muscle Beach Pro, the Toronto Pro Supershow, the Hawaii Pro and the New York Pro.

He was runner-up at the Olympia in 2017 and 2019 and at the Arnold Classic in 2017, and won the Masters Olympia in 2025.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.