Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Angel Calderon Frias vs Keone Pearson

Angel Calderon Frias
Angel Calderon Frias
2 2
4 head-to-head meetings
Keone Pearson
Keone Pearson
Athlete A
Angel Calderon Frias
Angel Calderon Frias
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Keone Pearson
Keone Pearson
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
4 Shared Contests
2021 First Meeting
2024 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Angel Calderon Frias vs Keone Pearson head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Keone Pearson: Keone Pearson Complete Profile – Workout and Diet.

Meetings
4
Angel Calderon Frias
2 ahead
Keone Pearson
2 ahead
Span
2021–2024
At the Olympia
Angel Calderon Frias 2–2 Keone Pearson in 4

In 4 meetings, including 4 at the 212 Olympia, Angel Calderon Frias and Keone Pearson are dead even, finishing ahead 2 times apiece.

Every contest Angel Calderon Frias and Keone Pearson both entered

Year Contest Division Angel Calderon Frias Keone Pearson Winner
2024 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #3 #1 Keone Pearson
2023 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #3 #1 Keone Pearson
2022 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #2 #6 Angel Calderon Frias
2021 Mr. Olympia Men's 212 Bodybuilding #4 #14 Angel Calderon Frias

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Angel Calderon Frias and Keone Pearson meet that test 4 times. For scale, this database holds 25 recorded results for Angel Calderon Frias and 18 for Keone Pearson across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Angel Calderon Frias and Keone Pearson at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Angel Calderon Frias reached his competitive peak around 2014, one of his strongest placement years (50% win rate across 2 contests in the window).

Keone Pearson reached his competitive peak from 2022 to 2024, one of his strongest stretches (83% win rate across 6 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Angel Calderon Frias, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

The Olympia record climbs steadily: tenth in 2019, seventh in 2020, fourth in 2021, second in 2022, third in 2023 and 2024. Six consecutive appearances and four of them in the top four.

2020 produced five professional wins, including the British Grand Prix, the Europa Dallas and the Romania Muscle Fest Pro, which he won again in 2021.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.