Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Betty Pariso vs Dena Westerfield

BP
Betty Pariso
4 0
4 head-to-head meetings
Dena Westerfield
Dena Westerfield
Athlete A
BP
Betty Pariso
United States Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Dena Westerfield
Dena Westerfield
United States Women's Bodybuilding
4 Shared Contests
2006 First Meeting
2010 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 18, 2026

Betty Pariso vs Dena Westerfield head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
4
Betty Pariso
4 ahead
Dena Westerfield
0 ahead
Span
2006–2010
At the Olympia
Betty Pariso 1–0 Dena Westerfield in 1

In 4 meetings, Betty Pariso finished ahead of Dena Westerfield 4 times to 0, including 1 Mr. Olympia showdown.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Betty Pariso Dena Westerfield Winner
2010 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #5 #13 Betty Pariso
2010 Phoenix Pro Women's Bodybuilding #2 #5 Betty Pariso
2009 New York Pro Championships Women's Bodybuilding #2 #5 Betty Pariso
2006 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #6 #14 Betty Pariso

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Betty Pariso
4
Wins Head-to-Head
4 shared contests
Dena Westerfield
0
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Betty Pariso Dena Westerfield Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.