Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Boyer Coe vs Casey Viator

Boyer Coe
Boyer Coe
3 7
10 head-to-head meetings
Casey Viator
Casey Viator
Athlete A
Boyer Coe
Boyer Coe
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Casey Viator
Casey Viator
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
10 Shared Contests
1979 First Meeting
1995 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Boyer Coe vs Casey Viator head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
10
Boyer Coe
3 ahead
Casey Viator
7 ahead
Span
1979–1995
At the Olympia
Boyer Coe 1–1 Casey Viator in 2

In 10 meetings, Casey Viator finished ahead of Boyer Coe 7 times to 3, including 2 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Boyer Coe Casey Viator Winner
1995 Olympia - Masters Men's Open Bodybuilding #10 #12 Boyer Coe
1982 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #3 Casey Viator
1982 Grand Prix Sweden Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #3 Casey Viator
1982 Grand Prix Belgium Men's Open Bodybuilding #8 #4 Casey Viator
1980 Pittsburgh Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #1 Casey Viator
1980 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #4 #14 Boyer Coe
1980 Grand Prix Pennsylvania Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #1 Casey Viator
1980 Grand Prix Miami Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #2 Casey Viator
1980 Grand Prix California Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #3 Casey Viator
1979 Canada Pro Cup Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #5 Boyer Coe

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Boyer Coe
3
Wins Head-to-Head
10 shared contests
Casey Viator
7
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Boyer Coe Casey Viator Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →