Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Boyer Coe vs Mohamed Makkawy

Boyer Coe
Boyer Coe
8 4
12 head-to-head meetings
Mohamed Makkawy
Mohamed Makkawy
Athlete A
Boyer Coe
Boyer Coe
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Mohamed Makkawy
Mohamed Makkawy
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
12 Shared Contests
1978 First Meeting
1984 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 23, 2026

Boyer Coe vs Mohamed Makkawy head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Boyer Coe: Boyer Coe – Complete Profile, Workout And Diet.

Our full story on Mohamed Makkawy: Mohamed Makkawy – Complete Profile: Height, Workout And Diet.

Meetings
12
Boyer Coe
8 ahead
Mohamed Makkawy
4 ahead
Span
1978–1984
At the Olympia
Boyer Coe 1–2 Mohamed Makkawy in 3

In 12 meetings, Boyer Coe finished ahead of Mohamed Makkawy 8 times to 4, including 3 at the Mr. Olympia.

Every contest Boyer Coe and Mohamed Makkawy both entered

Year Contest Division Boyer Coe Mohamed Makkawy Winner
1984 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #13 #2 Mohamed Makkawy
1982 World Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #4 Boyer Coe
1982 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #7 Mohamed Makkawy
1982 Grand Prix Sweden Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #1 Mohamed Makkawy
1982 Grand Prix Belgium Men's Open Bodybuilding #8 #1 Mohamed Makkawy
1981 Grand Prix Wales Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #8 Boyer Coe
1981 Grand Prix Belgium Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #10 Boyer Coe
1981 Canada Pro Cup Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #10 Boyer Coe
1980 Canada Pro Cup Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #9 Boyer Coe
1979 Canada Diamond Pro Cup Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #8 Boyer Coe
1978 Professional World Cup Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #7 Boyer Coe
1978 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #6 Boyer Coe

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Boyer Coe and Mohamed Makkawy meet that test 12 times. For scale, this database holds 79 recorded results for Boyer Coe and 39 for Mohamed Makkawy across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 23, 2026.

Boyer Coe and Mohamed Makkawy at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Boyer Coe reached his competitive peak from 1964 to 1966, one of his strongest stretches (30% win rate across 10 contests in the window).

Mohamed Makkawy reached his competitive peak around 1972, one of his strongest placement years (50% win rate across 2 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.