Camala Rodriguez vs Latorya Neisha Watts
Camala Rodriguez 
Pick two different athletes to compare.
Camala Rodriguez vs Latorya Neisha Watts head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.
- Meetings
- 11
- Camala Rodriguez
- 3 ahead
- Latorya Neisha Watts
- 8 ahead
- Span
- 2014–2017
- At the Olympia
- Camala Rodriguez 0–4 Latorya Neisha Watts in 4
In 11 meetings, Latorya Neisha Watts finished ahead of Camala Rodriguez 8 times to 3, including 4 at the Figure Olympia.
Every contest Camala Rodriguez and Latorya Neisha Watts both entered
| Year | Contest | Division | Camala Rodriguez | Latorya Neisha Watts | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #12 | #2 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2017 | Arnold Classic Australia | Women's Figure | #6 | #2 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2017 | Arnold Classic | Women's Figure | #4 | #3 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2016 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #6 | #1 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2016 | Ms International | Women's Figure | #2 | #1 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2016 | Arnold Classic Australia | Women's Figure | #4 | #1 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2015 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #4 | #1 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2015 | Ms International | Women's Figure | #1 | #4 | Camala Rodriguez |
| 2015 | Arnold Classic Australia | Women's Figure | #1 | #5 | Camala Rodriguez |
| 2014 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #13 | #5 | Latorya Neisha Watts |
| 2014 | California State | Women's Figure | #1 | #3 | Camala Rodriguez |
How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Camala Rodriguez and Latorya Neisha Watts meet that test 11 times. For scale, this database holds 37 recorded results for Camala Rodriguez and 27 for Latorya Neisha Watts across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.
Camala Rodriguez and Latorya Neisha Watts at their peak
Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.
Camala Rodriguez reached her competitive peak around 2008, one of her strongest placement years.
Latorya Neisha Watts reached her competitive peak from 2015 to 2016 (2 years), winning 2 Olympia titles in Women's Figure.
Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.
Camala Rodriguez and Latorya Neisha Watts, beyond the scoreline
The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.
Camala Rodriguez
2015 is the season: the Ms. International and the Arnold Classic Australia, the Arnold's two figure titles, in one year. She was fourth at the Olympia the same season, her best finish there.
The rest of the wins run 2013 to 2014: the California State Pro, the Houston Pro, the New York Pro and the Pittsburgh Pro.
Latorya Neisha Watts
Back-to-back Figure Olympia titles in 2015 and 2016, second place in 2017 and again in 2019, and fifth on her first appearance in 2014 and her last in 2020. Six Olympia appearances, four of them in the top two.
2016 is the season that defines the record. She won the Olympia, the Ms. International and the Arnold Classic Australia, then added the Arnold Classic Brasil in 2017. Winning the Olympia and the Arnold's own figure title in the same year is the closest the division has to a sweep.
Camala Rodriguez profile Latorya Neisha Watts profile Compare other athletes
Attribute Tug-of-War
Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.
Not enough data to compare
Career attributes could not be calculated for one or both athletes.
Career Overlap Timeline
Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.
Career timeline unavailable
We do not have enough dated contest results to draw a timeline.
Career Stats Comparison
These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.
Share This Comparison
Comparison unavailable
We could not load this comparison. This might be a temporary connection issue.
Choose two athletes to compare
Search above to compare career stats, head-to-head meetings, and shared contests.
This page counts finishing positions
Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.
- A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
- Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
- Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
- A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.