Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Casey Viator vs Chris Dickerson

Casey Viator
Casey Viator
3 6
9 head-to-head meetings
Chris Dickerson
Chris Dickerson
Athlete A
Casey Viator
Casey Viator
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Chris Dickerson
Chris Dickerson
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
9 Shared Contests
1979 First Meeting
1982 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 22, 2026

Casey Viator vs Chris Dickerson head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Casey Viator: Casey Viator – Complete Profile: Height, Workout And Diet.

Our full story on Chris Dickerson: Chris Dickerson – Complete Profile: Height, Workout And Diet.

Meetings
9
Casey Viator
3 ahead
Chris Dickerson
6 ahead
Span
1979–1982
At the Olympia
Casey Viator 0–2 Chris Dickerson in 2

In 9 meetings, Chris Dickerson finished ahead of Casey Viator 6 times to 3, including 2 at the Mr. Olympia.

Every contest Casey Viator and Chris Dickerson both entered

Year Contest Division Casey Viator Chris Dickerson Winner
1982 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #1 Chris Dickerson
1980 Pittsburgh Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Casey Viator
1980 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #14 #2 Chris Dickerson
1980 Night of Champions Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #1 Chris Dickerson
1980 Grand Prix Pennsylvania Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Casey Viator
1980 Grand Prix Miami Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #1 Chris Dickerson
1980 Grand Prix Louisiana Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Casey Viator
1980 Grand Prix California Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #1 Chris Dickerson
1979 Canada Pro Cup Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #1 Chris Dickerson

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Casey Viator and Chris Dickerson meet that test 9 times. For scale, this database holds 25 recorded results for Casey Viator and 54 for Chris Dickerson across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 22, 2026.

Casey Viator and Chris Dickerson at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Casey Viator reached his competitive peak from 1969 to 1971, his strongest placement years on record (73% win rate across 11 contests in the window).

Chris Dickerson reached his competitive peak from 1982 to 1982, winning 1 Olympia title in Men's Open Bodybuilding.

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.