Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Courtney King vs India Paulino

Courtney King
Courtney King
3 4
7 head-to-head meetings
India Paulino
India Paulino
Athlete A
Courtney King
Courtney King
United States Women's Bikini
Athlete B
India Paulino
India Paulino
United States Women's Bikini
7 Shared Contests
2013 First Meeting
2017 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Courtney King vs India Paulino head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Courtney King: Courtney King Workout, Diet Program and Biography.

Meetings
7
Courtney King
3 ahead
India Paulino
4 ahead
Span
2013–2017
At the Olympia
Courtney King 2–1 India Paulino in 3

In 7 meetings, India Paulino finished ahead of Courtney King 4 times to 3, including 3 at the Bikini Olympia.

Every contest Courtney King and India Paulino both entered

Year Contest Division Courtney King India Paulino Winner
2017 IFBB Hawaii Pro Women's Bikini #1 #2 Courtney King
2016 Mr. Olympia Women's Bikini #1 #3 Courtney King
2016 Arnold Classic Australia Women's Bikini #5 #1 India Paulino
2015 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Women's Bikini #5 #1 India Paulino
2015 IFBB New York Pro Women's Bikini #3 #1 India Paulino
2015 Mr. Olympia Women's Bikini #3 #4 Courtney King
2013 Mr. Olympia Women's Bikini #7 #5 India Paulino

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Courtney King and India Paulino meet that test 7 times. For scale, this database holds 14 recorded results for Courtney King and 37 for India Paulino across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Courtney King and India Paulino at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Courtney King reached her competitive peak from 2016 to 2016, winning 1 Olympia title in Women's Bikini.

India Paulino reached her competitive peak from 2011 to 2013, one of her strongest stretches (50% win rate across 10 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

India Paulino, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Two Arnold Classic bikini titles three years apart, in 2013 and 2016, plus the Arnold Classic Australia in 2016. Bikini turns its top over faster than any other division, and holding that position across three years is rare.

She was third at the Olympia in 2012 and again in 2016, and second at the Arnold Classic in 2012 before winning it the following year.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.