Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Dana Linn Bailey vs Juliana Malacarne

Dana Linn Bailey
Dana Linn Bailey
1 3
4 head-to-head meetings
Juliana Malacarne
Juliana Malacarne
Athlete A
Dana Linn Bailey
Dana Linn Bailey
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Juliana Malacarne
Juliana Malacarne
Brazil Women's Physique
4 Shared Contests
2012 First Meeting
2015 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Dana Linn Bailey vs Juliana Malacarne head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
4
Dana Linn Bailey
1 ahead
Juliana Malacarne
3 ahead
Span
2012–2015
At the Olympia
Dana Linn Bailey 1–1 Juliana Malacarne in 2

In 4 meetings, Juliana Malacarne finished ahead of Dana Linn Bailey 3 times to 1, including 2 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Dana Linn Bailey Juliana Malacarne Winner
2015 Ms International Women's Physique #2 #1 Juliana Malacarne
2014 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #2 #1 Juliana Malacarne
2013 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #1 #7 Dana Linn Bailey
2012 New York Pro Women's Physique #16 #1 Juliana Malacarne

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Dana Linn Bailey
1
Wins Head-to-Head
4 shared contests
Juliana Malacarne
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Dana Linn Bailey Juliana Malacarne Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →