Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Daniely Castilho vs Jennifer Taylor

Daniely Castilho
Daniely Castilho
2 1
3 head-to-head meetings
Jennifer Taylor
Jennifer Taylor
Athlete A
Daniely Castilho
Daniely Castilho
Canada Women's Physique
Athlete B
Jennifer Taylor
Jennifer Taylor
United States Women's Physique
3 Shared Contests
2017 First Meeting
2019 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 23, 2026

Daniely Castilho vs Jennifer Taylor head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Daniely Castilho
2 ahead
Jennifer Taylor
1 ahead
Span
2017–2019
At the Olympia
Daniely Castilho 2–1 Jennifer Taylor in 3

In 3 meetings, Daniely Castilho finished ahead of Jennifer Taylor 2 times to 1, including 3 at the Women's Physique Olympia.

Every contest Daniely Castilho and Jennifer Taylor both entered

Year Contest Division Daniely Castilho Jennifer Taylor Winner
2019 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #4 #7 Daniely Castilho
2018 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #3 #4 Daniely Castilho
2017 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #7 #2 Jennifer Taylor

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Daniely Castilho and Jennifer Taylor meet that test 3 times. For scale, this database holds 12 recorded results for Daniely Castilho and 49 for Jennifer Taylor across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 23, 2026.

Daniely Castilho and Jennifer Taylor at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Daniely Castilho reached her competitive peak from 2015 to 2016, one of her strongest stretches (50% win rate across 2 contests in the window).

Jennifer Taylor reached her competitive peak from 2009 to 2010, one of her strongest stretches (20% win rate across 5 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Daniely Castilho, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

The 2017 Arnold Classic is the biggest title, and it came in the same season as her first Olympia appearance. She was third at the Olympia in 2018 and fourth in 2019.

The other wins are the World Amateur Championships physique B class in 2015, the Toronto Pro Supershow in 2018 and the Mr Big Evolution Pro in 2021.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.