Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Dayana Cadeau vs Renee Casella

Dayana Cadeau
Dayana Cadeau
2 1
3 head-to-head meetings
Renee Casella
Renee Casella
Athlete A
Dayana Cadeau
Dayana Cadeau
Haiti Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Renee Casella
Renee Casella
United States Women's Bodybuilding
3 Shared Contests
1997 First Meeting
2000 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 23, 2026

Dayana Cadeau vs Renee Casella head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Dayana Cadeau
2 ahead
Renee Casella
1 ahead
Span
1997–2000

In 3 meetings, Dayana Cadeau finished ahead of Renee Casella 2 times to 1.

Every contest Dayana Cadeau and Renee Casella both entered

Year Contest Division Dayana Cadeau Renee Casella Winner
2000 Jan Tana Pro Classic Women's Bodybuilding #3 #1 Renee Casella
1998 Jan Tana Pro Classic Women's Bodybuilding #3 #7 Dayana Cadeau
1997 Jan Tana Pro Classic Women's Bodybuilding #11 #14 Dayana Cadeau

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Dayana Cadeau and Renee Casella meet that test 3 times. For scale, this database holds 35 recorded results for Dayana Cadeau and 14 for Renee Casella across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 23, 2026.

Dayana Cadeau and Renee Casella at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Dayana Cadeau reached her competitive peak from 1996 to 1998, one of her strongest stretches (17% win rate across 6 contests in the window).

Renee Casella reached her competitive peak from 1986 to 1988, her strongest placement years on record (33% win rate across 6 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Dayana Cadeau, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Two Ms. International titles and four Olympia podiums: third in 2005, second in 2006 and 2007. She was also runner-up at the Ms. International in 2002, 2006 and 2008.

She competed in the lightweight class for most of her career and moved between weight categories as the division kept redrawing them.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.